Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 0 |
I agree with your argument, however, there is no way for the modern society to 'un-touch guns' Laws about guns were made hundreds of years ago and it's too late to stop guns from coming into contact with humans. Now the focus must be on the fact that taking away guns won't help the problem it would just simply take away innocent people's form of self-defense and like I said before criminals won't give up their guns so it would give them an advantage.
Kinder eggs were banned to protect young kids from swallowing them. Guns are not the same thing. Guns must be kept there for self-defense reasons.
Just because guns are bans it doesn't mean that the people who already have them won't still use them. I agree to ban guns will make it harder for more people to get them, but what about the people who already own them? If criminals already don't follow the law, I doubt that they would have a change of heart and suddenly decide that they should give up the guns to the authorities.
Terrorists and criminals don’t follow the law. So why would you expect them to follow gun laws? If you change the second amendment to state that you can’t own guns it’s just taking away people’s and the police’s way of defending themselves. Just because guns are taken away and gun control laws are formed doesn’t mean the criminals will follow. This does not mean that you should not have certain laws in place, it just means taking away the guns from good people won’t stop the bad and/or mass shootings.
The second amendment doesn't need to be repealed for the modern society.
It is believed that the guns are bad and only hurt you and the society, but the fact is that they also do the opposite. They continue to save many people’s lives such as how a Houston homeowner was able to defend himself when 3 unarmed men tried to come into his home and kill him. He used the gun he had to scare the criminals into not hurting him until the police arrived. The second amendment should not be updated because people should be able to have guns to defend themselves.
The second amendment doesn't need to be repealed for the modern society.
It is believed that the guns are bad and only hurt you and the society, but the fact is that they also do the opposite. They continue to save many people’s lives such as how a Houston homeowner was able to defend himself when 3 unarmed men tried to come into his home and kill him. He used the gun he had to scare the criminals into not hurting him until the police arrived. The second amendment should not be updated because people should be able to have guns to defend themselves.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |