Return to CreateDebate.commamoffat • Join this debate community

Ms Moffat's Class


Taminajeter's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Taminajeter's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I agree with your argument, however, there is no way for the modern society to 'un-touch guns' Laws about guns were made hundreds of years ago and it's too late to stop guns from coming into contact with humans. Now the focus must be on the fact that taking away guns won't help the problem it would just simply take away innocent people's form of self-defense and like I said before criminals won't give up their guns so it would give them an advantage.

1 point

Kinder eggs were banned to protect young kids from swallowing them. Guns are not the same thing. Guns must be kept there for self-defense reasons.

1 point

Just because guns are bans it doesn't mean that the people who already have them won't still use them. I agree to ban guns will make it harder for more people to get them, but what about the people who already own them? If criminals already don't follow the law, I doubt that they would have a change of heart and suddenly decide that they should give up the guns to the authorities.

1 point

Terrorists and criminals don’t follow the law. So why would you expect them to follow gun laws? If you change the second amendment to state that you can’t own guns it’s just taking away people’s and the police’s way of defending themselves. Just because guns are taken away and gun control laws are formed doesn’t mean the criminals will follow. This does not mean that you should not have certain laws in place, it just means taking away the guns from good people won’t stop the bad and/or mass shootings.

1 point

The second amendment doesn't need to be repealed for the modern society.

It is believed that the guns are bad and only hurt you and the society, but the fact is that they also do the opposite. They continue to save many people’s lives such as how a Houston homeowner was able to defend himself when 3 unarmed men tried to come into his home and kill him. He used the gun he had to scare the criminals into not hurting him until the police arrived. The second amendment should not be updated because people should be able to have guns to defend themselves.

1 point

The second amendment doesn't need to be repealed for the modern society.

It is believed that the guns are bad and only hurt you and the society, but the fact is that they also do the opposite. They continue to save many people’s lives such as how a Houston homeowner was able to defend himself when 3 unarmed men tried to come into his home and kill him. He used the gun he had to scare the criminals into not hurting him until the police arrived. The second amendment should not be updated because people should be able to have guns to defend themselves.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]